<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Flickering Pixels &#8211; Group Blogging Project &#8211; Chapter 2</title> <atom:link href="http://churchcrunch.com/flickering-pixels-group-blogging-project-chapter-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://churchcrunch.com/flickering-pixels-group-blogging-project-chapter-2/</link> <description>Exploring the Intersection of Web Technology and the Church</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:54:31 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Mr Shields: no one calls me that&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flickering Pixels by Shane Hipps</title><link>http://churchcrunch.com/flickering-pixels-group-blogging-project-chapter-2/comment-page-1/#comment-50921</link> <dc:creator>Mr Shields: no one calls me that&#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flickering Pixels by Shane Hipps</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=5591#comment-50921</guid> <description>[...] Pixels. I read it as part of a group blogging project hosted on ChurchChrunch.  I have already posted three times about this book but I wanted to post one more time to wrap it [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pixels. I read it as part of a group blogging project hosted on ChurchChrunch.  I have already posted three times about this book but I wanted to post one more time to wrap it [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Flickering Pixels – Group Blogging Project – Chapter 11 - ChurchCrunch</title><link>http://churchcrunch.com/flickering-pixels-group-blogging-project-chapter-2/comment-page-1/#comment-44011</link> <dc:creator>Flickering Pixels – Group Blogging Project – Chapter 11 - ChurchCrunch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:01:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=5591#comment-44011</guid> <description>[...] my previous post for chapter 2 , I said that I had a bad taste in my mouth because of previous videos that I had seen with Shane [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my previous post for chapter 2 , I said that I had a bad taste in my mouth because of previous videos that I had seen with Shane [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Josh Wagner</title><link>http://churchcrunch.com/flickering-pixels-group-blogging-project-chapter-2/comment-page-1/#comment-43146</link> <dc:creator>Josh Wagner</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:52:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=5591#comment-43146</guid> <description>Yeah.  I certainly have looked at how the medium has influenced the message recently, but mostly in music.  (Post on my blog about it, here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://tr.im/kwSo&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://tr.im/kwSo&lt;/a&gt; )  Didn&#039;t really think about that in terms of technology as a medium.  Will be aware now, though. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah.  I certainly have looked at how the medium has influenced the message recently, but mostly in music.  (Post on my blog about it, here: <a
href="http://tr.im/kwSo" target="_blank">http://tr.im/kwSo</a> )  Didn&#039;t really think about that in terms of technology as a medium.  Will be aware now, though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: johndyer</title><link>http://churchcrunch.com/flickering-pixels-group-blogging-project-chapter-2/comment-page-1/#comment-43098</link> <dc:creator>johndyer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:28:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=5591#comment-43098</guid> <description>Josh, I think Hipps point is that most people don&#039;t give any consideration to how mediums work. For example, youth group boys don&#039;t ever consider that breaking up with a girl via text message will send a different message than doing it in person. So Hipps wants to wake us up to start thinking about how and when to use media appropriately. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, I think Hipps point is that most people don&#039;t give any consideration to how mediums work. For example, youth group boys don&#039;t ever consider that breaking up with a girl via text message will send a different message than doing it in person. So Hipps wants to wake us up to start thinking about how and when to use media appropriately.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: johndyer</title><link>http://churchcrunch.com/flickering-pixels-group-blogging-project-chapter-2/comment-page-1/#comment-43097</link> <dc:creator>johndyer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:26:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=5591#comment-43097</guid> <description>Adam, McLuhan like Hipps does say that mediums communicate along with messages (try breaking up with someone via text message instead of in person and see if the effect is different).
However, one of the bigger issues is that media use shapes not only the message, but the speaker. After using Twitter for a year or so, I now find myself thinking in 140 character sound bytes. No matter what message I tweet, the medium of twitter has shaped me.
Recognizing and acknowledging that we make tools and tools remake us is McLuhan/Hipps&#039; point. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, McLuhan like Hipps does say that mediums communicate along with messages (try breaking up with someone via text message instead of in person and see if the effect is different).</p><p>However, one of the bigger issues is that media use shapes not only the message, but the speaker. After using Twitter for a year or so, I now find myself thinking in 140 character sound bytes. No matter what message I tweet, the medium of twitter has shaped me.</p><p>Recognizing and acknowledging that we make tools and tools remake us is McLuhan/Hipps&#039; point.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam_S</title><link>http://churchcrunch.com/flickering-pixels-group-blogging-project-chapter-2/comment-page-1/#comment-43087</link> <dc:creator>Adam_S</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:21:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=5591#comment-43087</guid> <description>I understand what you are saying. And I agree he could be much clearer. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand what you are saying. And I agree he could be much clearer.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam_S</title><link>http://churchcrunch.com/flickering-pixels-group-blogging-project-chapter-2/comment-page-1/#comment-43086</link> <dc:creator>Adam_S</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:18:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=5591#comment-43086</guid> <description>You may be right Dave, but that is not what I have understood.  I am trying to read with an open mind, but I am being influenced by some of what I have heard him say in other contexts as well.  And if your definition of message is the one he is trying to use, then he really needs to be much clearer.  Because he is mixing the use of that word in a variety of contexts. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may be right Dave, but that is not what I have understood.  I am trying to read with an open mind, but I am being influenced by some of what I have heard him say in other contexts as well.  And if your definition of message is the one he is trying to use, then he really needs to be much clearer.  Because he is mixing the use of that word in a variety of contexts.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SCBubba</title><link>http://churchcrunch.com/flickering-pixels-group-blogging-project-chapter-2/comment-page-1/#comment-43074</link> <dc:creator>SCBubba</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:15:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=5591#comment-43074</guid> <description>I think Dave&#039;s got the right idea about what &quot;the message&quot; is. The message that was &quot;broadcast&quot; from God is not necessarily &quot;the message&quot; that many people receive. What was sent (and the truth of it) does not, and has  not, changed. What is received is affected by the medium as well as other factors (context, prior knowledge, translation, etc).
Shane&#039;s book as a whole, I think, is dealing with the message as it is received by people not so much as it is at the source. So, we need to really take a look at the methods we are using when we relay God&#039;s message. The methods we used to receive it may have changed what we received vs the original. And how we send it back out will affect how it is received by others.
All that being said, Hipps could have been a little clearer on what he was specifically meaning when he wrote that the message changes...
Sorry for the potentially odd way of saying all that. I&#039;m an engineer and we tend to look at things a little differently... :-) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Dave&#039;s got the right idea about what &quot;the message&quot; is. The message that was &quot;broadcast&quot; from God is not necessarily &quot;the message&quot; that many people receive. What was sent (and the truth of it) does not, and has  not, changed. What is received is affected by the medium as well as other factors (context, prior knowledge, translation, etc).</p><p>Shane&#039;s book as a whole, I think, is dealing with the message as it is received by people not so much as it is at the source. So, we need to really take a look at the methods we are using when we relay God&#039;s message. The methods we used to receive it may have changed what we received vs the original. And how we send it back out will affect how it is received by others.</p><p>All that being said, Hipps could have been a little clearer on what he was specifically meaning when he wrote that the message changes&#8230;</p><p>Sorry for the potentially odd way of saying all that. I&#039;m an engineer and we tend to look at things a little differently&#8230; <img
src='http://crunchcache.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: stephenbateman</title><link>http://churchcrunch.com/flickering-pixels-group-blogging-project-chapter-2/comment-page-1/#comment-43068</link> <dc:creator>stephenbateman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:37:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=5591#comment-43068</guid> <description>Scripture has a LOT of numbers...so someone must&#039;ve counted...Evaluation certainly matters to God. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scripture has a LOT of numbers&#8230;so someone must&#039;ve counted&#8230;Evaluation certainly matters to God.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: phil cunningham</title><link>http://churchcrunch.com/flickering-pixels-group-blogging-project-chapter-2/comment-page-1/#comment-43065</link> <dc:creator>phil cunningham</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:11:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://churchcrunch.com/?p=5591#comment-43065</guid> <description>I read heard this quote from Bono where he said &quot;let&#039;s quit asking God to bless what we are about to do and start getting involved in what God is  doing as it is blessed already. In this I have also seen myself and other make their own plans and ask God to bless it. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read heard this quote from Bono where he said &quot;let&#039;s quit asking God to bless what we are about to do and start getting involved in what God is  doing as it is blessed already. In this I have also seen myself and other make their own plans and ask God to bless it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Served from: churchcrunch.com @ 2010-03-20 09:55:23 by W3 Total Cache -->