Comments on: Sunday Special QA No. 34 http://churchcrunch.com/sunday-special-qa-no-34/ Exploring the Intersection of Web Technology and the Church Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:56:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: human3rrorhttp://churchcrunch.com/sunday-special-qa-no-34/comment-page-1/#comment-50537 human3rror Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:51:06 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=7001#comment-50537 both. i have to! i'm from GT and my wife is UGA. both. i have to! i'm from GT and my wife is UGA.

]]> By: human3rrorhttp://churchcrunch.com/sunday-special-qa-no-34/comment-page-1/#comment-50536 human3rror Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:46:06 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=7001#comment-50536 word. word.

]]> By: Tomhttp://churchcrunch.com/sunday-special-qa-no-34/comment-page-1/#comment-50535 Tom Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:32:39 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=7001#comment-50535 I know this is for John, but I can't help but chime in for myself ;). Georgia Tech. I know this is for John, but I can't help but chime in for myself ;) .

Georgia Tech.

]]> By: Tweets that mention Sunday Special QA No. 34 - ChurchCrunch -- Topsy.comhttp://churchcrunch.com/sunday-special-qa-no-34/comment-page-1/#comment-50534 Tweets that mention Sunday Special QA No. 34 - ChurchCrunch -- Topsy.com Mon, 16 Nov 2009 02:30:41 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=7001#comment-50534 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Saddington and Carol Thomas, Alltop. Alltop said: Sunday Special QA No. 34 http://bit.ly/3fSwt6 Tech.alltop [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Saddington and Carol Thomas, Alltop. Alltop said: Sunday Special QA No. 34 http://bit.ly/3fSwt6 Tech.alltop [...]

]]> By: Ryanhttp://churchcrunch.com/sunday-special-qa-no-34/comment-page-1/#comment-50533 Ryan Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:20:50 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=7001#comment-50533 Georgia or Georgia Tech? Georgia or Georgia Tech?

]]> By: human3rrorhttp://churchcrunch.com/sunday-special-qa-no-34/comment-page-1/#comment-50531 human3rror Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:12:06 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=7001#comment-50531 Joanna,<br /><br />I think the intentions are \"good\" but the methods are bad. I also think trending topics should be \"organic\" in nature, instead of programmatic, \"gamed,\" and fabricated.<br /><br />i don't think we win over people be being obnoxious. <br /><br />my 2cents. Joanna,

I think the intentions are \”good\” but the methods are bad. I also think trending topics should be \”organic\” in nature, instead of programmatic, \”gamed,\” and fabricated.

i don't think we win over people be being obnoxious.

my 2cents.

]]> By: joannahttp://churchcrunch.com/sunday-special-qa-no-34/comment-page-1/#comment-50524 joanna Sun, 15 Nov 2009 15:47:44 +0000 http://churchcrunch.com/?p=7001#comment-50524 Lately i've seen lots of groups trying to force a topic into the twitter trending topics list through excess tweeting for the purposes of promoting something or even evangelizing. What do you think of this strategy? Do you think it's worth the effort? To me it seems having a small group of people try to force a topic up the list seems to defeat the purpose of trending topics in capturing what is getting talked about by the most people. It also seems like a lot of effort to get a few words briefly into a list that is often mostly rubbish. Lately i've seen lots of groups trying to force a topic into the twitter trending topics list through excess tweeting for the purposes of promoting something or even evangelizing. What do you think of this strategy? Do you think it's worth the effort?

To me it seems having a small group of people try to force a topic up the list seems to defeat the purpose of trending topics in capturing what is getting talked about by the most people. It also seems like a lot of effort to get a few words briefly into a list that is often mostly rubbish.

]]>